Pirelli P7000 SuperSport Tires
Pirelli P7000 SuperSport Tires
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 20, 2003]
Steve
Model Reviewed:
86 328 IC BMW
Michelin Pilots...Decent traction, changed them at every oil change it seemed. EXPENSIVE Bought a set of Hankook/Hancock Ventus(Korean Tire) Won a Red Dot Engineering Excellence award for design. Easily the best set of tires I've ever owned. Dirt Cheap and handled 10X better than anything I've owned. Wet traction is absolutely unbelievable. Dry traction is ferocious. Virtually zero sidewall flex. truly cant say enough about these tires, so why do I have a brand new set of Pirelli's?? Unfortunately, moved to Florida and took a flat. Stereo design means I dont have a spare, time commitments meant I had it towed to the nearest chain I could find to make a 2 pm meeting. Meineke didnt sell Hankook, so I bought a set of 4 Sumitomo's and buzzed off to my meeting. 3 failures later in less than 3 months, Sidewall failures not puntures, Meineke replaced them with the Pirellis. Have had them for a week now. To Date Impressions: Wet weather, better than average, better than the Pilots, far less than the Ventus in the wet. Sumo's arent even in the ballpark due to vague feel and tendency to chase on slight moisture. Dry Weather, slightly better than the Pilots, less sidewall flex than Pilots, More sidewall flex than Ventus. Ventus tires in slide or 4 wheel drift give constant feedback and linear traction. Michelins were slippery in drifts. Pirellis seem to bias towards oversteer slightly yet give enough confidence to push towards the limits, feedback trails off and tends toward vague at full slide. Sumitomo's were vague from beginning to end in a slide but at least were consistent unlike the Pilots. Of all the tires, the only reason I liked Sumitomo's were because you can take them to three SCCA track days and spend all three days in drifts/slides and still have 10000 miles left in them. Michelins were overpriced and under delivered. Pirelli's seem like a dream compared to the Sumo's recently removed yet from everything I read in the other reviews will tend to go to hell after 10k miles. We'll see. Bottom line is that the next set WILL again be the Ventus tires and I am kicking myself for being impatient and not having had the car towed to a place that sells the darned things. Steven T. Ziegler Ex Professional Motorcycle Roadracer Amateur Driver(SCCA) |
[Feb 25, 2003]
mike Mack
Model Reviewed:
2001
Strength:
none
Weakness:
run over any normal chuck hole - you will have a blow out. Speed does not matter - I had two blow out at under 20 mph. I have had 6 blow outs with thses tires. I could not be anymore uphappy. |
[Feb 24, 2003]
gazi8
Model Reviewed:
2000 / BMW
Strength:
Looks nice (aggresive)
Weakness:
NOISE, road feel makes you think something is wrong with the car! NOISY!! The minute I put these tires on, I noticed the noise. Not bad at first, by now that I have over 15000 miles on them, they are driving me crazy. At first I thought the wheels ball bearings were bad! Thats how bad the noise and road feel is. The only reason I liked them from the begining was their look- they look aggressive but that is it! The road noise and feel are horrible especially on 17 inch wheels. Don't get these! I will be looking into the Michelins even the tires still have a good amount of tread - shamefull!! |
[Aug 26, 2002]
Dan
Model Reviewed:
2001
Strength:
None
Weakness:
see review above These tires are very, very NOISY... They were very decent in the beginning, but after 10000 kilometers the noise level can't be handled, and traction in wet is gone (very dangerous)... Tires still have a lot of a thread, but I am looking forward to replace them... Will try Michelins. I can NOT recommend these tires at ANY price... |
[Jul 28, 2002]
denbish
Model Reviewed:
97 Nissan Maxima SE
Strength:
Corning and steering response.
Weakness:
Tread wear...and the road noise that will test your car stereo to drown out. I was excited to be getting rid of the standard tires that came with my car and harness something more aggressive in the Pirelli's. Instantly I was pleased with my choice, the car was phenominal in the rain and with cornering and steering response. The tires performed superb under stress and the car always handled predictibly. Sadly, we can't live in the past and the tires aged....and not well. While maintaining it's sticky attributes in dry conditions, rain suddenly has become a problem. With approximately 18,000 miles on the tire, I hadn't thought that replacing them would be a concern. As the tread depletes, along with the rain issue, the road noise became deafening. When I took off my snow tires, I looked forward to the quiet ride of my summer tires. Silly me...my road tires were louder. For the amount of money...the mileage was vile and I expect the road noise to be at a minimum. Similar Products Used: Goodyear Eagle RS-A, Yokohama Avid |
[May 30, 2002]
pc109
Weakness:
weak sidewall 225/50 16 In the past 3 years that I've used these tires...I've had to replace 3 due to broken sidewall (there were bulges) probably from hitting potholes...but I don't remember hitting any big ones... otherwise...good tire...long treadwear...decently quiet except when the tread runs low... I recommed getting the road hazard warranty if you get these at my sidewall ratio... |
[Apr 09, 2002]
foreignaffairs
Model Reviewed:
Various
Strength:
Hydroplane resistence, wear, appearence, all season traction. A good value if noise is not a concern
Weakness:
Noise, turn-in, sidewall weakness in very short sizes Here in wet Portland, wet traction and hydroplane resistence is a major concern. These do very well in hydroplane resistence and are good wet. Fair dry. Biggest complaint is noise, but my car is so quiet that this doesn''t bother me as much as some. Similar Products Used: Many |
[Nov 09, 2001]
osamu
Model Reviewed:
1991 Acura Legend
Strength:
Dry and wet handling. Looks. Long lasting. Price was not too high.
Weakness:
Very noisy. A constant roar that gets unbearable. When new, these tires handled great in dry conditions, very good in wet and looked great. The tires weren''t too noisy until about 10,000 miles. The noise got worse until I couldn''t stand them any longer. Similar Products Used: None |
[Nov 05, 2001]
James
Strength:
traction and handling...
Weakness:
Road noise, lots of it...rough ride... Impressive tread design..Question on what PSI is correct for 2000 Mustang GT..Ford says 30, Pereilli says 45...who is correct? Am running at 35 PSI as 45 is too much...tires offer good traction and handling.. Similar Products Used: Dunlop, Michelin.. |
[Oct 31, 2001]
Bryan
Model Reviewed:
98 ford countor SVT
Strength:
unbelieveable traction you just keep pushing them. i have found out that i usualy give out before they do
Weakness:
i dont like them too much in the rain but i thing that most of that is because the car has so much power a great tire to own....anyone who is serious about traction needs to take a good look at the 7000''s Similar Products Used: GoodYear Eagle F1 |