Dunlop D60 A2 Tires
Dunlop D60 A2 Tires
[Sep 21, 2000]
Jim
Model Reviewed:
95 Escort GT
Strength:
Handles the corners well....no protesting squeal. Fairly good in the wet.
Weakness:
Not the best in snow. Wear pattern not even. Overall I like the tires. They did wear down in the center portion WAY too fast (properly inflated). They're just over half way through the treadwear warranty and will need replacing soon. Dry/wet handling and traction good... but wet traction decreased greatly when worn to the point they are now. Snow traction is ok at best...no quick starts. Similar Products Used: OE tires were Goodyear GT+4 - Dunlops much better. |
[Sep 09, 2000]
Chander Balakrishnan
Strength:
Good grip and cornering when new. Good traction under braking
Weakness:
I had the tires on my Audi 5000 quattro, all four became extremely noisy with time, and there was severe vibration. I would not recommend the Dunlop D60A2 Similar Products Used: Have Pirelli P400's now. They are very quiet. |
[Jul 15, 2000]
arthur baldwin
Strength:
endurance, long wear
Weakness:
rougher ride than need be; but not too bad i've had these tires on my '95 toyota camry since 4/95, over five years now. I've got over 74,000 miles on these tires and have had the car up to about 100mph coming back on a trip; the tread is still useable. They handle great, last long, but they do ride a little rough. |
[Jul 14, 2000]
Chris
Strength:
Great performance for the money. Excellent handling in both wet and dry conditions.
Weakness:
Snow performance is quite lousy. Put real snow tires on. I'm on my second set of these tires. The first ones lasted around 30k miles (of sometimes spirited driving!), so I got a prorated treadwear discount on the second set. You can't beat the performance at this price (~$60 for the 195/60/HR14 model). Similar Products Used: Michelen MXV4 - much more expensive for similar performance. |
[Jun 19, 2000]
jim
Strength:
impressive all weather performance and great price
Weakness:
none $45 P195/60R-14 85H (tires.com) Similar Products Used: michelin |
[Jun 05, 2000]
Caylan
Model Reviewed:
92 Honda Civic Si
Strength:
Performance/Price Ratio=excellent
Weakness:
Hydroplaning is a problem in some areas. Paid $65 for them 4 years ago. Similar Products Used: Bridgstone |
[Apr 19, 2000]
Max
Model Reviewed:
1982 280zx
Strength:
Superior Wet/Dry traction, A true budget High-performance tire.
Weakness:
relatively weak snow traction, quick wear with spirited driving. I have had these tires for about 8 months now. In that span of time I have put approx. 10,000 fairly hard miles on them. Similar Products Used: Bridgestone....Dunlops are WAY better. |
[Mar 24, 2000]
Robert
Strength:
not expensive, good value, great wet traction, no problems
Weakness:
slightly high road noise. Less than 60 per tire for 185/60-14 size. no handling problems, love them. not perfect, but what is? not the best for cornering, and some (not a lot) of road noise at speeds of 50 to 60. Similar Products Used: stock bridgestones: very bad wet traction (almost crashed twice, amazing, easy hydroplaning) |
[Jan 25, 2000]
Brian
Model Reviewed:
pre-JLB
Strength:
Dry grip, cost
Weakness:
snow $60/tire (several years ago) Similar Products Used: Falken, Pirelli P6, Firestone |
[Dec 01, 1999]
Rob
Strength:
excellent handling, very good in both wet & dry conditions
Weakness:
a little noisy Have a set on the family station wagon (a Peugout Turbo- don't snicker, it's a GREAT car) amd the Dunlops have done all that I need in a tire. Handling is very secure whether in wet or dry condition. Even decent in moderate snow. Mileage has been as predicted-I'm nearing approx 35k on the tires and expect another 10k. Very reasonably priced via TireRack. Only slight negative would be on the highway they are a little noisy, not offensively, but u know they're rumbling below you. (Then again, I've never found a tire that wasn't noisy-maybe it's me?) |