Bridgestone Tires Turanza T Tires
Bridgestone Tires Turanza T Tires
USER REVIEWS
[Aug 06, 2000]
andrew tj
Model Reviewed:
1995 volvo 960
Strength:
its traction, tread, & cornering
Weakness:
its noises, it's noisy for me (especially when it's in the highway) you'll get most of what you paid for Similar Products Used: None |
[Feb 24, 2000]
Tim
Strength:
Smooth,quiet ride. Superb wet traction. Long wearing. Predictable handling.
Weakness:
Seem to sqeaul easily in cornering, but dry grip seems ok. Paid $66.99 per tire for a 13 inch size. I would recommend this as a premium tire for a non-enthusiast driver as most people will not push the car hard enough to make it sqeaul. This a good choice if Michelin tires are more expensive in your area. Similar Products Used: Bridgestone Turanza S--the "T" replaced it. The "S" handled better, but did not wear as well. |
[Jul 26, 2001]
Rick
Model Reviewed:
97 Pontiac Grand Am
Strength:
Dry handling -- but only when you pump them up with a lot more pressure; with the pressure up, they handle almost exactly as well as much more expensive performance tires with less tread life.
Weakness:
Dry handling at reccommended pressure -- My car's reccommended pressure is 35psi. They handle horribly at 35, and I actually wore the print off about 60% of the heigh of the sidewalls, driving my first set at 35psi. Pumped up to their max (44), they handle much better (and I suspect they will wear better). A suprisingly good tire, priced competitively, with very long life. I put 85,000 miles of mixed highway and performance driving on them, and had lots of tread left. Previous tires I've had always wore out before their treadware warranty was up. Similar Products Used: Goodyear Eagle GS -- came with the car, began blowing up at 50,000 miles. |
[Aug 11, 2001]
Robert
Strength:
None
Weakness:
See above Now - BAD Similar Products Used: The original Turanza "S" was MUCH better |