Land Rover Range Rover SUV | Crossover
Land Rover Range Rover SUV | Crossover
[Feb 18, 2001]
Erik
Strength:
Amazing handling in ALL types of conditions. I've driven 4X4s for years and NOTHING compares or even comes close to Rovie. We deliberately tried to get it stick in a snow bank and we couldn't. Put this thing in Low and it'll pull a mountain. There's also a LOT of cool aftermarket stuff that can be done to them like Old man Emu suspsension systems, air lockers...etc.
Weakness:
Not a vehicle for people who don;t pay attention to their vehicle. You gotta check the fluids and keep up on the maintenance or you'll be in for a BIG $upriSe! On the other hand, all Land Rovers are meant to be able to be worked on in the field so if you're not a complete klutz, you should be able to do the basics like oil changes, brake pads and such. British Atlantic is a good source. OK, it's a British vehicle but don't get the idea that they suck -- leave that notion to Jaguar, Bentley and Aston-Martin. Rovers were orginally built as utiliarian vehicles and it's only recently with the introduction of the Range Rover & Discovery that that image has changed. Check out a Defender and you'll see what it's all about. Basically, all of my friends clamor to ride up to the mountains with me because they know Rovie can get through just about anything Mother Nature throws at it. Even my die-hard friends who drive Cherokees, Pathfinders, Jeeps, Land Cruisers & Infiniti QX4s all give kudos to it. Similar Products Used: There's nothing that comes close to a Land Rover Product. MAYBE a Hummer but I've heard discouraging reports of them lately. |
[Dec 20, 2000]
Roger
Strength:
Unique styling, amazing off road ability, largest back seat I've ever seen (bigger than a Lincoln Town Car), very comfortable, they don't hold their value so you can get them comparatively cheap.
Weakness:
British reliability, if you can't fix it yourself be prepared to pay BIG $$$, gas mileage @ 12.5 mpg average. I was looking for a (used) SUV for around $20K that would provide me with the following; 1) comfort, 2) off road prowess, and 3) respectable towing capacity. The Range Rover County LWB fulfills all of these objectives admirably. This is my daily driver. As such, it is extremely comfortable and pleasant to drive. I also own a '72 911 that I use for track events. I plan on using the Range Rover to tow this vehicle to the track. Last but not least, this vehicle is used for "recreational" off roading. This was probably the deciding factor in choosing a Range Rover over an Expedition or Tahoe. The solid axles front and rear, coupled with the adjustable ride height and traction control, make this thing virtually unstopable. Additionally, the '95 County LWB provides you with most of the high tech gadgetry of the new Range Rover (e.g., Air Suspension), with the looks of the Classic (which I prefer). Similar Products Used: My wife drives a '99 Subaru Forester. Not really a valid comparison, i.e., car vs. truck. I like the Range Rover, she likes the Forester. |
[Nov 03, 2000]
Park John
Model Reviewed:
4.6 HSE
Strength:
Off-road prowess, solid design, luxurious amenities, premium image
Weakness:
Premium price ($$$$), utilitarian ride and handling qualities At any rate, I had checked out several vehicles & and clearly the Range Rover, has best 4x4 capability, albeit I will rarely off road, the best Similar Products Used: These are the SUV's and cars I test drove. |
[Oct 25, 2000]
Joseph Mendez
Strength:
I have own other LR vehicles in the past. This SUV has a commanding view of the road/landscape. Off-road capabilities is unmatched. The only SUV maker that actually encourages owners to take it off-roading. Video and literature included. No Japanese or American maker will do this. Great creature comfort and EXTREMELY luxurious. Land Rover denotes adventure!
Weakness:
If you are used to owning an American car you will not like the controls eg. windows switches. It is very British. This is not a weakness it's just that this is how they build their SUVs. Like I mentioned earlier: If over the years you owned a Japanese or American car and are used to it you will find some of the design features to be diffrent. BUT this is the uniqueness of this vehicle. It does not change its' design so it can please everyone for market share. You have to admire LR for not conforming to the buying public. Other SUVs are cookie cutters specially the American versions eg. Navigator's, Excursions, Jimmy's etc...they all look the same - just re-badge for higher price. Similar Products Used: NONE on this planet! |
[Jul 22, 2000]
Rick
Strength:
Nice ride for the most part. High feeling and a good command of the road. Styling is different from the rest of the crowded SUV scene.
Weakness:
Very weak engine. Gas guzzler! Leather interior feels cheap. Drove in this car in a carpool for 8 months. The first impression was nice, but sitting in this car day in and day out lowered my initial opinion of this SUV to that of an overpriced British import. It might be good offroad, but for general urban trekking, you can find a better American or Japanese made car out there for less money to boot. Similar Products Used: None |
[Jul 28, 2000]
George
Strength:
Excellent ride, Styling, Luxurious, Sound System, Cargo Space, Air Suspension.
Weakness:
Engine needs more HORSES, expensive Absolutely the best SUV money can buy, it commands respect on the road and the ride is very comparable to that of any luxury car. The driving position is excellent and the leather quality is what I expected, but the icing on the cake would be for land rover to replace that ancient V8 so as to stay ahead of the competition and I expect they will with the up coming replacement Similar Products Used: X5, Landcrusier, LX470 |
[Jan 10, 2000]
Adam Tang
Strength:
tons of options, leather, seat heaters, awesome sound system, CD changer, air suspension, genuine British make -- go big!
Weakness:
price the ultimate bragging right. made by brits to b briggest of big, despite not being absolute biggest. tons of options, neat gate, very appropriate for sports enthusiast. wouldn't recommend using for off-road cuz of price tag(80,000). Can b equipped w/ GPS. air suspension works wonders when fording flooded streets. available w/ secodary, high RPM shift system -- heavy hauling or driving in elevated position Similar Products Used: Jeep Grand Cherokee, Ford Explorer XLT |
[Jun 07, 2001]
Monty Bernstein
Model Reviewed:
Discovery SE
Strength:
None at this point.
Weakness:
I miss my Toyota Land Cruiser. I have had mulitple problems with my Landie since owning it. The Power Windows have failed three times now. The A/C blows through the floor and defroster vents. I have have a friend that has one and he loves it, I guess I got a bad one, or did he get a good one. Similar Products Used: Land Cruiser |
[Jul 29, 2001]
Steve
Strength:
Good off road, reasonable on road. Probably seemed luxuios when new.
Weakness:
It's falling apart. Parts fell off during the test drive! And I hear that they're only good for about 80 to 100 thousand miles. Not at this price It's plastic! I can't beleive that a vehicle in this price range rattles this much and is put together this poorly. And who wants to be on their vehicle on a weekly basis. Similar Products Used: TLC was better in every way except ultimate off road. It didn't have the exotic (read quircky British) look inside, but they run forever and everr |
[Aug 05, 2001]
Abby Carlton
Model Reviewed:
Land Rover Holland & Holland Edition
Strength:
I have the holland and hollnad edition and it is perfect.
Weakness:
This car is has absolutly nothing weak about it well except for the fact that little drama queens like miss jamie use them a status symbols when they are obviously out of there reach. I just thought i would let everyone know that if you are looking for a great suv this is the one, and i would like to say that the girl that wrote before this needs to get a life, i am sure she lives in a trailer court in nevada. Similar Products Used: i have a BMW X5 a Lexus LX 470 and a Mercedes G500 but really none compare to the legendary land rovers. |