Bilstein Monotube Shocks Shocks
Bilstein Monotube Shocks Shocks
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 08, 2014]
bob johnston
Model Reviewed:
sport shocks
Strength:
Put a set of bilstein sport shocks on my 1970 BMW 2002 in 1974.....still in use today! Work perfectly!
Weakness:
None! best value Similar Products Used: Koni et al seem to not last like Bilsteins |
[Jul 18, 2011]
Yvan Campeau
Model Reviewed:
Dodge Ram 2500 SLT Diesel
Strength:
Nice colors, looks strongly constructed, smooth ride on nicely paved highways.
Weakness:
Not enough compression and needs much more rebound I made the decision to purchased these Bilstein shocks based on the information they give us about them being so good, but I should of had read the reviews in the first place. To soft! Truck is bouncing when going though wavy spots on the highway or over bridge joints. Not made for Ram 2500! I regret the purchase. Similar Products Used: N/A first replacing them |
[Dec 29, 2009]
Ian
Model Reviewed:
Ranger
Strength:
Handles Great, much better than other shocks on Rangers. Really a good shock for any Ranger. Shocks are getting warn, considering a second set. 104,000km's Similar Products Used: Stock Ranger Shocks. |
[Apr 13, 2009]
Gary
Model Reviewed:
Silverado 1500
Weakness:
too soft I purchased the Bilsteins in an attempt to get a firmer ride and less bounce for my truck. Immediately after receiving the shocks I noticed them to be more giving than the KYB Monomax shocks that I have. After installation, the truck rides softer and wobbles more than before. I bought the Bilsteins because others stated them to be firm but now I regret my decision to replace my shocks. Similar Products Used: KYB MonoMax |
[May 09, 2007]
Fred Black
Model Reviewed:
Ford f250 SD
Strength:
smooth, consistent, frees up suspension travel, good for off road.
Weakness:
a bit wallowy and divy. Truck sways and bounces more with these especially when the truck is loaded up. After one of the stock shocks failed I purchesed these for the truck thinking that they would ride like the Bilsteins I bought in the 80's for a Volvo and Ford Rainger. I am quite disapointed in them as they are not as firm as they used to be. Bilsteins used to be known as very firm shocks for a super solid and controlled street ride, but the newer generations of these shocks are a rather a bit softer. They are actually a lot softer than the stock shocks that come on the 2wd F250. I talked to Steve B. at Bilstein Ca. and he admitted (but only after much cajoling) that Bilsteins are not the Euro type shocks or yore. So, if your current shocks are softish or shot the Bilsteins will probably work just fine but, if you are looking for top street performance gains out of a damper I'd look elswhere. |
[Jan 29, 2007]
richbuga
Model Reviewed:
'81 Bronco
Strength:
Handle rough roads well.
Weakness:
They don't have a very positive response at the upper end of their travel. Maybe they are better suited for a lighter vehicle. I went with these because KYB and Edelbrock do not make rears that fit my rig, in their higher end shocks, and I can't say that I am all that impressed with them. Based on the other reviews here I expected a much stiffer ride. They always feel that they are giving way too much in their initial travel and then they recover with a good firm dampening action. The end result, for my vehicle, is a rather strange combination of handling characteristics consisting of a springy ride on light bumps, soft on the highway and a good predictable feel under harsh use. It seems that I am never really sure how they are going to react in a given situation... but, maybe they are doing exactly what they are supposed to do and I just have to get used to the beast riding like it never has before. Similar Products Used: Rancho 500's - very positive firm feel, took them off thinking they were bad...turned out to be the springs and now they don't make them anymore.
|
[Jul 22, 2006]
cameraman
Model Reviewed:
Ford E-350
Strength:
Reduce sway on my top heavy van.
Weakness:
Most expensive shocks money can buy and darned well worth the cost. I recently purchased a 1998 Ford E-350 van with a Telsta boom/bucket that goes up to 34 feet off the ground. I am a photographer and this boom/van is a perfect combo for my business.
|
[May 27, 2006]
john B
Model Reviewed:
Toyota T100
Strength:
Much larger diameter than my stock shocks and slightly stiffer. Lifetime warranty. I've put over 140,000 miles on my toyota T100 and was starting to question whether I wanted to trade it in for a car because the ride was not inspiring any confidence or fun any more. The ride on the original shocks at 140,000 miles was pretty uninspiring. The ride was bouncy and felt unstable at high highway speeds when making quick direction changes.
|
[Dec 22, 2004]
98RANGER
Model Reviewed:
Ford Ranger
Strength:
These shocks exceed all expectations of replacement shocks.
Weakness:
none I purchased Bilstein HD monotube shocks for my 1998 Ford Ranger, based on the performance they gave on a previous vehicle. I could not believe the difference the Bilsteins made on the Ranger. The vehicle drives like it is on rails. All aspects of driving performance are greatly improved, including breaking performance. This is the best money that can be spent on a vehicle. If Ford would make these shocks OEM there vehciles would rate much better than they do. Try Bilstein and you will never buy another brand of shock. Similar Products Used: Monroe, Gaberial, Rancho |
[Jul 10, 2004]
TLgunner
Model Reviewed:
Acura 3.2TL
Strength:
Ride, design and construction.
Weakness:
A little pricey but you get what you pay for. Awesome shocks/struts, one of the better modifications I made to my car. In concert with H&R OE Sport springs, Eibach sway bars and 17" wheels/tires, the car feels like it's on rails. The ride is firm, not stiff, well controlled and tight. I had Bilsteins on my old Chevy S-10 so I was familiar with their quality. Beautifully designed and well built struts. Similar Products Used: Stock struts. |