Venom 400 Control Module Engine Management
Venom 400 Control Module Engine Management
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 17, 2001]
Eric McDougal
Model Reviewed:
1997 Toyota Tacoma
Strength:
Looks cool under the hood, that is it.
Weakness:
Everything. This unit sucks. My truck runs horrible with it hooked up, it skips and backfires and certain throttle positions. I would not reccomend this. Spend the money on a Jet Chip. Similar Products Used: None |
[Jun 20, 2001]
karl harrell
Model Reviewed:
1997 3.8l camaro
Strength:
doesn't wait to accelerate when you step on the gas
Weakness:
the on/off switch should be in the car so i can turn it on and off from inside. not turn it off, then stop my car go under the hood, and turn it back on. i got a 6 cylinder camaro with nitrous, intake, and exhaust, i put this thing in and i got quicker response from my car when i accelerate. i also took about a tenth second or so off my et. maybe the other guys should learn how to turn the thing on. Similar Products Used: jet chips are still better because you can get them customized. |
[Aug 17, 2001]
phil
Model Reviewed:
97 camaro z28
Strength:
quicker response, more horsepower around 4 rpm to redline.
Weakness:
Once open throttle is reached, product is unnecesary. Product just helps reaching open throttle at a lower RPM it feels. After installing the product I noticed a lot quicker response when i punched the gas. The product works really well when coming off the line. Gas mileage went down a bit but the on/off switch comes handy. The LED light is a cool feature but on my camaro I still haven't been able to route it through the firewall. Besides that installation was really easy once i figured out where the map and tps were. The cost was fair i thought. Similar Products Used: None |