DynoMax Street Series System Cat back Exhaust Systems
DynoMax Street Series System Cat back Exhaust Systems
USER REVIEWS
[Sep 22, 2006]
ordieman
Model Reviewed:
Dodge Ram 1500
Strength:
Not too loud, yet it still sounds great. Not expensive either.
Weakness:
none so far Very impressed with the product. I actually bought the Super Turbo Kit for the price mentioned earlier. Sounds great. Nice deep growl on start up, and when you are in the throttle. Not annoying like what I've heard from the popular Flowmaster. Don't get me wrong, Flowmaster Exhausts are great but not what I was looking for. If you want a nice deep sound but not loud enough to get tickets, take a look at this kit. Similar Products Used: N/A |
[Feb 18, 2003]
prb24
Model Reviewed:
'98 Jeep Cherokee
Strength:
Price. Looks. Sound.
Weakness:
It was easier to have it installed, rather than doing it myself This is my 2nd Dynomax system, the 1st was on an '88 S-10. I've had 2 Flowmaster systems since, and was unhappy with both. The Force II system I put on my '95 Chevy 4X4 hit the bottom of the cab when in reverse, and the American Thunder system on my '96 Mustand GT also had fitiment problems, and rusted out at the welds. So...I went back to Dynomax, and am extremely pleased. The stainless steel tip looks high quality, and it makes the Jeep sound pretty tough. I would definetely recommend it. Similar Products Used: Flowmaster Cat-Backs |
[Sep 09, 2002]
Ryan
Model Reviewed:
1998 Civic
Strength:
sound quality intimidating
Weakness:
none, yet After doing quite a bit of research on the web about different exhausts, I had narrowed it down to 2. The spex N1 and the dynomax. My friend has the apex and it has a nice growl from the outside. But, on the inside its almost unbearable. So i went with the dynomax and I'm very pleased. It has the perfect, deep, throaty tone. Not to ricey like the apex. Notice i put 0 on the price, that's because it was my birthday present :) Similar Products Used: stock (suck balls) |
[Aug 04, 2002]
Nick C
Model Reviewed:
1979 Pontiac
Strength:
Good mellow sound at the perfect level. Can be installed in an evening with basic tools.
Weakness:
No real complaints other than the goofy looking tips. No big deal. Also, you have to re-use the stock Y pipe in the installation. Just telling you guys, it is a y-pipe-back system. Put the 2.25 inch super turbo system on my 1979 403 T/A to replace the rusted out (flowmasters?) mufflers that were on the car and literally falling apart. The fit was good and the install was easy to complete in my garage. These mufflers are not too loud while still delivering a deep smooth sound when cruising around town. I sometimes turn off my radio just to listen to the engine. I can't wait to put some headers on this engine and hear what it sounds like. Can't say anything about performance increases as I still have the cat and the factory exhaust manifolds upstream. Overall a good deal (especially because I got a $25 mail in rebate after my purchase). Good system. Similar Products Used: nope. |
[Mar 04, 2002]
Jake Arnold
Model Reviewed:
1997 Ford
Strength:
Cheaper, more unique sound, easy to put on and a great web page that allows you to listen to the exaust system you want.
Weakness:
not a wide variety of mufflers, but the Super Turbo and Ultra Flo are awesome This exaust is awsome, I love the sound. Similar Products Used: stock exaust |
[Oct 30, 2001]
Peter huh
Model Reviewed:
1989 Honda Civic Hatchback
Strength:
stainless steel all around the muffler, lifetime warranty, quiet muffler
Weakness:
none I don''t have the whole dynomax system but i do have the universal muffler.. I love my exhaust! It is very quiet when your driving normally but if you floor it, then it has a mid-low growl. It doesn''t sound as low and deep as the nicer models like greddy, dcsports or tanabe but it''s good enough for me. I am very pleased with it. If you want something louder, get another brand! There is loss of a small amount of torque around the low rpm range but that''s the penalty you have to face when you upgrade to a larger pipe diameter. The high end is better tho Similar Products Used: stock |
[Jul 13, 2001]
SCOTT SCHEER
Model Reviewed:
2001 MUSTANG
Strength:
ABSOLUTELY FIRST CLASS SOUND QUALITY
Weakness:
DON'T HAVE AN OPINION YET I INITIALLY PURCHASED FLOWMASTERS (40 SERIES) THE INTERIOR NOISE WAS Similar Products Used: VERY PLEASED,I WANTED THEM INITIALLY BUT THE SHOP GUIDED ME TO FLOWMASTERS |
[Apr 18, 2001]
seth
Model Reviewed:
1993 ford mustang lx 5.0
Strength:
the exhaust gives unbeleivable horesepower!!
Weakness:
none, the only problem is the company i bought it from took almost 4 months to get my order to me because they messed up the order twice in short, if you want mad power and torque, then go with what i did. flowmaster is just to damn unoriginal. the dynomax is right in the middle, its better than flowmaster but not as good as borla. but in the end, the power is what matters and dynomax delivers plenty of it Similar Products Used: none. i have heard flowmaster( too many people have them, and just the same as dynomax, except doesnt give as much power) |
[May 14, 2001]
Marcus
Model Reviewed:
Super Turbo(full catback system)
Strength:
great deep growl sound, noticeable increase in horsepower, very inexpensive
Weakness:
none as of yet I did a lot of research on exhaust systems, and found that the dynomax super turbo was right for me. It has this deep sound to it. Not like those loud annoying flowmasters that are hard to live with after a few months. And it noticeably increased my horsepower. I got 2&1/4" aluminum piping from the catback to the "S" style Dyno Super Turbo muffler, and a double plated slanted 3" chrome tip. I recommend this to anyone who wants an inexpensive worthwhile upgrade without spending $400+... Use the money you save to buy a cold air intake and BAM, tear up them streets! Similar Products Used: stock, no comparison/ flowmaster, too loud and whiney |