MTX Audio RTX03A Crossovers
MTX Audio RTX03A Crossovers
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 24, 2007]
bumpin
Model Reviewed:
RTX03
Strength:
True 3-way operation - can be used for sub, mid, tweet. Center and differential rear fill outputs.
Weakness:
Lacks features of modern crossovers but was a really good unit in its day. Screws for the power/ground/remote connector stripped out, some channels died after a few years. This was the 2nd active crossover I owned. I had it for about 8 years before a couple of the outputs died. It worked out very well for me. It doesn't have a remote bass knob or subsonic filter, but we are taking 1994 here. This unit had a couple unique features: a center channel (summed) output and a differential output (right channel is subtracted from the left). I used the differential output for rear fill, with great results. Similar Products Used: Audio Control 24xs |
[Jul 03, 2001]
Stevie Jamin
Strength:
Looks, ease of use.
Weakness:
Could use another pair of inputs, higher preout outputs. A basic crossover that works well when you don't have one. Easy to use and install, and doesen't look bad. I noticed a slight drop in sound quality when used with my top end Eclipse CD player, then when I didn't use it. Wished it came with 3 preamp inputs rather than 2, and an external bass control. I'm currently using mine only as a subwoofer crossover, which defeats the purpose of having a 3-way crossover. Similar Products Used: None. First crossover bought |
[Dec 26, 2000]
dave daignault
Strength:
not much, I like vr's in general, so playing with all the knobs was fun, I could tune a system with it, and have,mine and others using this piece, but I have used other produtcs I liked much better
Weakness:
its a rough piece,its functional, still way better then nothing, but..... I was in a hurry to get a x and bought one, I should have waited...and gotten a Coustic XM3e or 5e, which I have owned, and was much better then the mtx, no comparison, better yet Audio Control, which I now have Similar Products Used: Coustic (coustics x's are very underrated, by the way, should get a lot more press), audio control |
[Jul 24, 2000]
alfie
Strength:
ver good sound quality-channel seperation-very clean
Weakness:
only 2 imputs with 3 outputs i wanted to control my subs from both my eq and my crossover i paid 130 for it new i think it was well worth it. Similar Products Used: None |
[Jul 26, 2000]
Michael
Strength:
Very easy to use.
Weakness:
Could have a little better sound quality. I added this crossover shortly after the installation of my amps. For $119 that I paid I am happy with the product. At high volume levels there is a noticable hiss from the crossover. But all in all this is an easy to use product and worth the $119 I paid. Similar Products Used: None |