Acura MDX SUV | Crossover
Acura MDX SUV | Crossover
[Nov 21, 2000]
D H
Strength:
Hey, finally took delivery, Mahogany with Touring Package w/o nav.
Weakness:
Definite A-pillar wind noise on the highway, I would also like the Get in line, these things will be hard to get for some time. Similar Products Used: Expedition - only seats one less, stowable rear seat is perfect, much more refined overall. |
[Nov 22, 2000]
ron
Strength:
interior space is unbelievable. the fit & finish are what you would expect out of a honda product. and the drive feels secure; gas mileage better than any other suv. front seats offer good support. great luxury for the price in an suv
Weakness:
a/c controls without the nav system are a little strange; however, the system works quite well. auto up windows, auto on headlights & xenons would make it perfect this suv could be recommended to anyone - the appeal really covers a broad cross section - from families because of the rear seats to snow birds who love the space for the trek to florida. so far, the quality is typical acura/honda - impeccable!! Similar Products Used: bmw x5 is $9,500 more when comparably equipped - that's nets out to $8,700 more when subtracting bmw's 3/36 included maintenance. the ride in the x5 is definitely sportier than the mdx but the mdx offers more of a luxurious feel. |
[Nov 11, 2000]
Robert
Model Reviewed:
MDX
Strength:
240-hp Engine, Great head & Leg room, even in back seat. Delighted to get 22-23 MPG for an SUV w/ such an Cavernous Interior. The Navigation system is very user friendly, although possibly not for those in Palm Beach... Leather seating is very comfortable. Seems to be very solid and well put together. Good buy considering all the amenities on this which are standard.
Weakness:
Sound System is somewhat weak compared to a car, but this may be the result of such a large interior, which is why I have not really heard an outstanding sound system in an SUV. The Honda engineering on this product is awesome: 1st. The magic seats for both rows 2 and 3 are amazing! They are very easy to access. Even though the 3ed seat is somewhat cramped, I am amazed that it even has one. Very good acceleration and a very precise feel in steering for a vehicle this size. Good sound isolation and the detail and quality of craftmanship is apparant. Very little wonder Motor Trend & Car + Driver have both listed this as their #1 SUV. Its all wheel drive, the ULEV emission system is one of the very few of any vehicle on the market today. Also its various computers and Navigation system are definately cutting edge state of the art technology for 2001. Similar Products Used: LX450... MDX feels far, far, more stable in turns. |
[Nov 18, 2000]
VN
Model Reviewed:
Acura MDX w/Navi+Touring
Strength:
Just about everything about this SUV is exceptional. The two things that stand out are the attention to detail and the absolute lack of any weaknesses whatsoever. The engine is phenomenal -- tons of power, but also tons of refinement. The handling is as good as my other car -- a Mercedes E320. This is a vehicle that can take corners and curves with abandon without worrying about whether you'll land on your side. The cargo room is something else, too. I was able to put a 7' couch in the back with 2nd and 3rd rows folded. Can't think of any other SUV other than the monsters where that would be possible (and on the monsters you'd have to remove the back seats from the vehicle!). The ergonomics set a standard as well -- I was able to figure out all the controls without referring to the car's manual. Even the navigation system is very intuitive.
Weakness:
The parking brake pedal sometimes rubs against the left foot when placed on the footrest. The MDX is the type of SUV that the industry should have had a long time ago, but didn't. Seems like Acura learnt from all the mistakes made by other car makers, and put together a dynamite package that really does not have any close competitor at this point. Similar Products Used: I test drove the BMW X5 3.0, and the Mercedes ML320. The X5 probably a tad better at handling, but also has a much harsher ride that transmits every tar strip or pothole to the body. The MDX has a noticeably larger interior than the X5, and many, many more features standard. The ML320 does not compare well with the MDX in any respect. I'm a Mercedes owner (E320), and the ML320 would have been my first choice for an SUV, but just one test drive in each of them was enough to settle the matter. I've also driven the Ford Explorer and Chevy Blazer as rental cars, and neither comes close to the MDX in overall design and refinement. |
[Oct 30, 2000]
s
Model Reviewed:
MDX
Strength:
Engine
Weakness:
Rough ride compared to other SUV's, Price a bit steep for features, Looks not the greatest. Look to the Montero LTD or Landcruiser if you want a real 4wd. If you want an on road 4wd perhaps the 6 cyclinder subaru would have been a better choice. Similar Products Used: None |
[Oct 30, 2000]
X Shadowz
Model Reviewed:
/MDX
Strength:
This car is loaded; even as a base model! Engine is well tuned to deliver good acceleration and passing power. Interior space/erognomics are excellent (first 2 rows at least, 3rd row better suited for people
Weakness:
Nothing on the side of this SUV to protect the vehicle from door dings. The dead pedal (left foot rest) should be further back. This is the widest of the mid-size SUVs, it could go for wider tires like mercedes uses, this should improve the handling, though its not bad (but not as good as the BMW X5 either). Difficult to get into 3rd row of seats (2nd row either folds down OR slides forward, but does not do both). I got my vehicle 2 weeks after dropping $1000 for the deposit... most people are waiting much longer (dealership hooked me up). I bought the "base" model for $34,850 (sticker): navigation system is $2000, touring option $3000 (includes different style but same size rims, power passenger seat, bose system, power fold-in side mirrors, memory seating). Didn't feel the touring option is worth $3000, especially since the rims are the same size and the stock stereo is a 7 speaker cd/cassete w/subwoofer. Navigation system is nice but I couldn't justify spending $2000 on a map - especially since you have to buy updates. Similar Products Used: BMW X5, Lexus RX300, Mercedes ML320, Mitsubishi Montero (2001) |
[Oct 23, 2000]
Tom James
Model Reviewed:
Acura MDX
Strength:
We had a 93 Ford Explorer and have been looking long and hard for a replacement. We wanted better handling, much better gas mileage and seating for more than five for our family.
Weakness:
Fit and finish outside impecible. Inside a few miscues on the leather upholstery which the dealer will fix. IT IS WIDE! Park in the outfield at the mall to save the paint (no door guards!), but the walk will do you and the rig good. $40000 and yes we love it! Similar Products Used: 86 Chevy Blazer - no comparison (teenager has it and we still luv it!) |
[Oct 10, 2000]
Rob
Model Reviewed:
MDX
Strength:
Everything! Good build, nice wide stance, great handling. Extremely intelligent engineering of seat, space and cargo area. Strong motor with automatic 4 wheel drive capability. Incredible stereo system in the To
Weakness:
As stated in the review above, the expensive accessories that should have been included in a vehicle of this caliber. Wheel flares? Side Steps? Rear Splash guards? The addition of these alone adds another 2K to the list price. That in itself is a downer. Mine is going to be right at 40K out the door. I'm on the waiting list, like many others. I am sure I am going to love the car, since I had already ordered a Pathfinder and then canceled to pay an extra 10K for this one. I love the space. It is the right size and still gives me the feeling of having a personal space inside the car. The drive was powerful with good brakes. I am going to love this vehicle... I am trading a 3series BMW in for it, so I'd better. Similar Products Used: Nissan Pathfinder, Lexus RX300, Chevy Tahoe |
[Oct 13, 2000]
Oren
Strength:
Seating posibilities, great engine, brilliant navigation system, good all around visibility, firm but comfortable seats, interior finish, feels very safe.
Weakness:
High accessory pricing. High demand combined with initial weak supply results in tough pricing choices. Fake wood looks ok, but why? I have owned the car (mahagony, navigation and touring package) for several days now, and this is only an initial impression. To my taste, the car is very appealing and the outside and inside finish is outstanding. Ride is pretty firm, but much less truck'ish than other SUVs I test drove, with very little internal noise (just the occasional pleasing sound of the engine). The car handles and accelerates extremely well (within the limitations of the 600 mile break-in period), and offers lots of power when you need it. Similar Products Used: None - My first SUV |
[Oct 09, 2000]
Dave
Strength:
Build quality is very high. Fit and finish first rate, does not feel or drive like a new model. Kyle (salesman) at Tonkin in West Slope was first ever car guy who knew more about the vehicle than i did, very nice.
Weakness:
Would be nice to have a power hatch like the new Dodge minivans. Accessories are expensive, $720+ for the glue on flares? Oh yeah, this is a luxo cruiser.... Drove one today and bought a mahogany touring w/o the navigation, should be here on 11/15, now the wait. Liked the MDX better than the RX300 for the same money, RX has just a wee bit better ride, MDX should blow it away if you have to get farther from the road than the shoulder. The 3rd row flip up seats are kid only, but fold completely into the floor so I don't have this huge 3rd seat sitting in my garage ala my expigition when I want to haul more than 3 bags of groceries. Overall Acura engineers should feel very good about hitting a sweet spot in the market on the first shot, they only planned on selling 40k units, I bet they sell out easily. I will be pissed if I can get a HONDA version at $25k next year.... Similar Products Used: Expedition - can you say nimble "not!!" |