Login  •  Register
 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 
Cat-Back System

More Products from Edelbrock >>
Link to this page

Edelbrock Cat-Back System

Loading Please Wait...

MSRP: $



 
Sorted by Latest Reviews |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Rating
Reviewed by:
kevin


Review Date
January 3, 2004

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 9

Price Paid:  $279.00

Year / Model Reviewed:
1991 Camaro Z-28

Summary:
Edelbrock is quality.It has an "old school" sound which I was looking for.I think it sounds alittle louder than flowmaster during acceleration, but quieter during crusing.It doesn't have that loud sound in the interior.I had Flowmaster and Borla with the single side exhaust.This is the best system out there.

Strengths:
quality material,sound

Weaknesses:
None

Similar Products Used:
Flowmaster rusted after 2 years,Borla


Would you like to Comment?
Join CarReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:
CubicInchLover


Review Date
December 3, 2003

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
4.50 of 5, 2.00 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 9

Price Paid:  $327.00 from Performance Parts -

Year / Model Reviewed:
1989 Chevy C1500 PU / 350-V8

Summary:
Being from the "old school" and a backyard racer from the 60's, Edelbrock is like a household name. Known for quality, performance, research and then more research. They do not sell junk. They back up their claims with tested and re-tested data. When they offer it for sale to the general public - you can be certain the product is ready to perform. Since I'm not a big fan of front wheel drive, rice-burners - no matter how well they perform (and I admit they do haul the wagon powefully) I was hesitant to install ANY product on the wifes "high-performance import". Yet I did hers at the same time I did my old workhorse pickup. Sorry, but the 6-banger import still sounds like a high-winding, grabbing for that last RPM buggy. Even Edelbrock could not overcome the "new wave" in engines. It DID perform better - but to my old crusty ears - it's still a rice-burner with lots of revs - more than adequate power - but still misses the roar and vibration of a good old small or big block piece of American iron. NOW --- My pick-'em'-up-truck -- with it's ungodly low 8.5 to 1 compression ratio and a severe lack of cam action - plus a computer that was "old school" when GM installed it --- benefitted GREATLY from a simple exhaust upgrade (CAT BACK) -- air-cleaner swap -- and ignition by REAL engineers who did not have to make California happy with emission controls that choked the engine to death. EDELBROCK IS SUPERB! Sounds great on low end -- torque improved -- low, mid and high end performance not only SOUNDS better -- but on the dyno the numbers are there for all to see.

Strengths:
Most mentioned above. Sound, power, performance, construction, warranty, ease of installation, great customer support and that EDELBROCK NAME!

Weaknesses:
(Jokingly he says:) Well, even Edelbrock couldn't overcome that 8.5 to 1 compression ratio and a cam that seems to have "flat lobes" without the possibility of "soupin' it up" unless the cam is aborted and a REAL one installed. But alas, this is NOT a true weakness of Edelbrock, but a punishment from the political prostitutes in California,

Similar Products Used:
On other vehicles -- ThrustMaster -- Performance Parts -- Fletchalls and a host of yet again "old school" performance parts -- MANY of which are no longer with us. HEADMAN HEADERS coupled with EDELBROCK'S INTAKE MANIFOLDS AND A WING-AND-A-PRAYER philosophy, I have been fortunate to be from an age where anything went and IF it went well enough -- IT'S STILL HERE TODAY. EDELBROCK IS STILL HERE -- THE YEARS SERVING TO PROVE THEY ARE THE LEADER AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE THE LEADER FOR YEARS TO COME!


Would you like to Comment?
Join CarReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:
fireturd350


Review Date
October 9, 2003

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 9

Price Paid:  $280.00 from Jegs

Year / Model Reviewed:
1990 Pontiac Formula

Summary:
Pretty decent exhaust system.

Strengths:
Lifetime warranty! Good tone, good performance. I Noticed an improvement from headers and catback on my stock 350.

Weaknesses:
Tone not quiet as deep as Borla's. Top as loud as Loud Mouth on top RPMs, other than some of the systems can be a little pricey. If you have the extra cash I still like Borla better.


Would you like to Comment?
Join CarReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:
Adriano


Review Date
August 1, 2002

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 9

Price Paid:  $0.00

Year / Model Reviewed:
 2000 Camaro V6

Summary:
Just put the edelbrock on my V6 Camaro and i love it..... very deep, fairly loud. NO ricey sound at all

Strengths:
cheap, great sound, good performance

Weaknesses:
none really, could be a tad louder


Would you like to Comment?
Join CarReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:
vern small


Review Date
March 12, 2002

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 3.00 votes

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 9

Price Paid:  $0.00

Year / Model Reviewed:
 1998 dodge durango

Summary:
This is a very good system I put a mopar performace chip in and noticed little difference,I put a k&n performance air filter and noticed little,but when I put the edelbrock cat back on I noticed a big difference.

Strengths:
Extra power

Weaknesses:
A little to noisy at highway speed


Would you like to Comment?
Join CarReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Next 4 Reviews >>
Latest Articles and Reviews:

Have travel costs changed your summer vacation plans?

  Yes - staying closer to home
  No - sticking with the original plan
  Tight budget + high prices = no vacation this year
  I'm waiting for the fall and winter deals

View Results
Advertise With Us | About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use The ConsumerREVIEW.com Network
 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com
Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda      RSS Feed